Solipsism Is Just as Stupid as Atheism
The solipsists deny the existence of tardyons, protons, physical atoms, and this physical universe. These people deny the existence of anything that exists outside of the psyche or the mind.
This is a dumb idea.
Every time that I bang my elbow on a corner or bite my tongue or get the flu, it is obvious that physical matter or tardyons or biology exist! Biology is real. The pain makes it real! My friends at work are real. They show up everyday with their unique look and personality.
The materialists, naturalists, nihilists, or atheists deny the existence of luxons and tachyons. These atheistic people deny the existence of everything that exists outside of the light cone! These people have chosen to believe that only tardyons or particles of physical matter exist, and that everything else that exists DOES NOT EXIST.
Atheism is just as stupid and idiotic as solipsism! Denying the existence of things that obviously exist is the very definition of stupidity or ignorance.
The materialists, naturalists, nihilists, or atheists deny the existence of luxons and tachyons. However, it is obvious that photons, quanta, quantum waves, or luxons exist. And, it is obvious that tachyons, the quantum fields, or conserved particles of energy exist. Therefore, it is extremely stupid to deny the existence of luxons and tachyons, as the materialists and atheists do, simply because the luxons and tachyons are massless, entropyless, syntropic, intangible, and non-physical. It is also idiotic to deny the existence of massless and entropyless quanta, simply because quanta are spirits, or packets of spirit matter, or packets of tachyons, or packets of energy.
It’s also a dumb idea to deny the existence of tachyons, because the quantum fields are obviously omnipotent tachyons, tachyonic tachyons, hyperdimensional energy beings, omnipresent conserved particles of energy, or perpetual motion machines. Luxons and tachyons obviously exist; therefore, there is no logical sense denying their existence as the materialists, naturalists, nihilists, and atheists do.
Atheism is just as stupid as solipsism!
Denialisms of any kind are automatically false because we can’t use our denials or ignorance as scientific evidence or observational evidence!
The Denialistic Philosophies of Science
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B084LDX7RM/
The atheistic physicists and scientists refuse to use their common-sense or their brains. It has been observed that tornado winds and hurricane winds are strong enough, powerful enough, and fast enough to drive a piece of straw through a tree or a piece of wood through concrete. Now imagine what a tachyon can do while it is traveling at an infinite velocity or quantum tunneling! That tachyon, hyperdimensional energy being, particle of spirit matter, or particle of energy can pass through our earth, our sun, a black hole, or our physical universe as if these physical things weren’t even there! That’s the power of Tachyonic Physics! Tachyons are omnipotent. Tachyons can travel at an infinite velocity and pass through tardyons, and luxons, and physical atoms, and physical universes as if those things weren’t even there.
Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atomism, and the other types of Atheism are stupid, because the atheists in general deny the existence of luxons and tachyons.
Mark My Words
The Null Hypothesis
I found the following figure helpful for understanding the null hypothesis, statistics, and their relationship to the scientific method.
Adapted from Pagano, R.R. (2010). Understanding Statistics in the Behavioral Sciences (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (p. 269.)
The null hypothesis in a science experiment and statistics states that the independent variable had NO EFFECT on the dependent variable. If the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variable, then the next step is to try to determine the size and the direction of the effect.
It’s helpful to have a handle on this, when we start discussing whether the independent variable has the “power” to produce a real effect on the dependent variable, or not. This is science, the scientific method, and statistics in action. We have to understand this, if we want to know how scientists use statistics to do science and science experiments.
In this science experiment, their sample size was 10,000, and they used the sign test. They tested whether the effect of the independent variable was positive or negative.
In the middle there, we have the Null Hypothesis, where there are 5,000 positive effects and 5,000 negative effects. The results are fifty/fifty, which is synonymous with pure chance. Pnull, the probability of a null, or the null hypothesis is always 0.50. The null hypothesis is fifty/fifty, or pure chance.
Whenever the results of a science experiment or statistical analysis are fifty/fifty, then they conclude that the results were caused by chance alone. Fifty/fifty is pure chance when gambling as well. When the results of the experiment are fifty/fifty, pure chance, or the null hypothesis, then they conclude that the independent variable didn’t have an effect on the dependent variable. It doesn’t have to be exactly 50/50 either. The size of the effect is miniscule if the results of the science experiment are hovering around the null hypothesis.
We are looking for a real effect, a sizable effect, or a significant effect, if we are to conclude that the independent variable is causing the dependent variable.
Looking at the percentages at the bottom of the table above, we observe that when the percentage comes within the 0.00 to 0.05 range, then the independent variable had a significant effect on the dependent variable and decreased the dependent variable a lot. If the percentage comes within the 0.95 to 1.00 range, then we conclude that the independent variable had a significant effect on the dependent variable and increased the dependent variable a lot.
Through science experiments, we are trying to establish causality, and thereby remove chance as the “causal explanation”. We are trying to reject chance or the null hypothesis. In science and statistics, chance is NOT a valid cause! That’s why Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics are invalid sciences or pseudo-sciences, because they use chance as their causal mechanism and are in fact Creation by Chance or Creation Ex Nihilo.
We cannot use chance, randomness, chaos, or disorder in science as our causal explanation and still remain within the realm of science. That’s why Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and Atheism are pseudo-sciences or religions masquerading as science, because they are Creation by Chance and use chance as their causal mechanism and make the claim that chance created everything that exists in this universe. Creation by Chance isn’t real. Creation by Chance is the null hypothesis, which was produced by chance alone. Chance has no discernable effect on anything. These people literally turned chance into their independent variable and then they made chance the cause of everything that exists in this universe.
Creation by Chance or the Null Hypothesis is precisely what we are trying to falsify and eliminate through science and our science experiments. Creation by Chance or “chance causality” is the Null Hypothesis. Materialism, Naturalism, and their derivatives such as Darwinism and Atheism ARE Creation by Chance or the Null Hypothesis. The Null Hypothesis tells us that we should eliminate Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and every other form of Creation by Chance from science. So, why aren’t we doing so?
It’s because the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, and Atheists have granted themselves a special pleading or a special exemption so that they don’t have to follow the rules of science and don’t have to prove their theories true through scientific experimentation and statistical analysis. Instead, these people unilaterally turned their theories and ideas into axioms and laws, and forbid us from falsifying their ideas and theories, so that their falsehoods will always be true.
They cheat!
That’s how they do science.
You will never see statistical analysis, the null hypothesis, science, the scientific method, and science experiments presented in quite this manner within our public schools because it falsifies Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and even Nihilism and Atheism. Our college professors have to at least make it seem as if the theory of evolution is true, or they will be fired from their jobs. They are not free to tell us the truth.
Our public schools don’t reward us for falsifying the second law of thermodynamics, the theory of evolution, or creation by chance. They punish us instead whenever we do.
The whole purpose of our public school system is to indoctrinate us into Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Behaviorism, Determinism, Atheism, and all the other forms of Creation by Chance. If you are not an atheist by the time you graduate from college, then your college professors have failed in their mission and their purpose. They have no other reason for being there. That’s how far our society has deteriorated in recent decades.
You can’t falsify or reject the Null Hypothesis, whenever the Null Hypothesis is Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, the Theory of Evolution, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, or any other form of Creation by Chance. By axiom, by law, by edict, and by decree, you have to retain the Null Hypothesis whenever the Null Hypothesis is Materialism, Naturalism, or one of their derivatives such as Darwinism and Atheism. That’s the way these people operate. They cheat! They call it peer review. It’s censorship and intimidation, which is why I work where they can’t get at me.
Thanks to the Atheists, we don’t have freedom of speech and freedom to teach in our public schools, but so far, that doesn’t seem to apply where my books are concerned. Here, I’m permitted to say anything that comes to mind. Here, I’m permitted to teach the truth if I want to do so.
Mark My Words